First Name | Willie |
Last Name | Davidson |
Year of Conviction | 1981 |
Year of Exoneration | 2005 |
State of Conviction | Virginia |
Trial, Bench Trial, or Guilty Plea | Trial |
Type of Crime | Rape |
Death Sentence | No |
Gender of Exoneree | Male |
Race of exoneree | White |
Juvenile | No |
Type of Innocence Defense |
|
Description / Quotes from Testimony Concerning Defense | ● Defendant’s mother and brother testified that defendant was asleep at the time of the crime. ● Witnesses testified that, on the night of the crime, defendant took asthma medication that puts him into a deep sleep. |
Did the defendant testify at trial? | Yes |
Quotes from Exoneree Testimony | “Q: How do you look upon that lady? A: Like a mother or grandmother… Q: Would you ever harm her? A: No sir. Q: Did you harm her in the early morning hours of November 24, 1980? A: No sir, I wouldn’t dream of it.” |
Types of evidence at trial |
|
Type of Forensic Evidence |
|
Types of Flawed Forensics |
|
Reason why invalid | (1) Masking |
Brief Quote / Description of Testimony | The victim was an O secretor and Davidson was a nonsecretor. The analyst was asked “Q. Assuming that on this tissue was fluid from the woman’s body and she’s a type O secretor, what percentage of the male population would be eliminated in determining the identity of the man who emitted the seminal fluid you found?” and answered, “A. About 42 percent of the population.” (The analyst also had stated the figure was 58%, all except the 38% who are O secretors and the 20% who are non-secretors). No donor could in fact be eliminated where H substances found were entirely consistent with the victim. See Part II.A.1 for a description of the problem of masking and non-quantification and discussion of similar cases. The analyst testified that questioned hairs were “consistent” with the defenant. |
Identity of eyewitness |
|
Lineup Procedures |
|
Suggestive Procedures | Yes – though acquaintance of victim ● Show-up – had stocking placed over his head by police in front of victim ● Suggestive remarks |
Quotes from testimony #1 | Victim acknowledged that Davidson had a stocking “over his face the night he was at the detective bureau.” Davidson was asked – “You are positive are you not, that the detective kept pulling down a woman’s stocking over your face and asking Miss [], is this it, is that it? A: Yes” The detective denied saying “is this it,” but acknowledged pulling the stocking over Davidson’s head in front of the victim – “I just pulled it down and she looked at him.” |
Unreliable Identification? | Yes ● Initially uncertain ● Could not see attacker’s face since he was wearing stocking mask |
Quotes from testimony #2 | Attacker was wearing a “stocking cap” over his face Did not initially provide police with the name Willie Davidson, explaining, “In fact, I didn’t hardly know what I was doing anyway because I just didn’t know.” |
Highest level reached | NR |