| First Name | Bernard |
| Last Name | Webster |
| Year of Conviction | 1983 |
| Year of Exoneration | 2002 |
| Testing inculpated culprit | Cold Hit |
| State of Conviction | Maryland |
| Trial, Bench Trial, or Guilty Plea | Trial |
| Type of Crime | Rape |
| Death Sentence | No |
| Gender of Exoneree | Male |
| Race of exoneree | Black |
| Juvenile | No |
| Type of Innocence Defense |
|
| Description / Quotes from Testimony Concerning Defense | ● Two witnesses testified to seeing defendant far away from crime scene immediately prior to when crime occurred. |
| Did the defendant testify at trial? | No |
| Types of evidence at trial |
|
| Type of Forensic Evidence |
|
| Types of Flawed Forensics |
|
| Reason why invalid | (1) Masking |
| Brief Quote / Description of Testimony | The victim was type B (secretor status not determined), and Webster was type A. The stain exhibited A and B blood group substances, so the perpetrator could have been an A or AB secretor. However, the analyst testified that perpetrator “should have been a Type A.” See Part II.A.1 for a description of the problem of masking and non-quantification and discussion of similar cases. |
| Identity of eyewitness |
|
| Multiple eyewitnesses | 3 |
| Lineup Procedures |
|
| Suggestive Procedures | No – little description of line-up |
| Unreliable Identification? | No – vague description of attacker |
| Highest level reached | Appeal |
| Claims Raised During All Appeals and Postconviction |
|
| Citations to judicial opinions | Webster v. State, 474 A.2d 1305 (Md. 1984) |